Apparently KONAMI thinks they are Spell Speed 2 and can be chained to something like a Dolkka trying to negate them. Here's the evidence.
4 posters
Battle Fader / Swift Scarecrow Ruling Change
Reaper of the Cards- Admin
- Posts : 579
Join date : 2012-03-11
Zane Truesdale- Core Team Member
- Posts : 136
Join date : 2012-05-25
Location : Groningen, Holland
Imma sue konami in the next couple of days ._.
Nemessie- Posts : 653
Join date : 2012-04-18
Location : Netherworld
So I was right last time!
isaac879- Core Team Member
- Posts : 125
Join date : 2012-04-14
Location : England
Would these rulings be deemed official and used at tournaments and on DN because to me it looks like they made a mistake saying both are quick effects. When battle fader was released in the battle pack with PSCT and it looks like a trigger effect. As well there are rulings on the KDE judge forum from 13 may 2011 that say that battle fader is a trigger effect and must be activated in direct response to the attack declaration.
Reaper of the Cards- Admin
- Posts : 579
Join date : 2012-03-11
I know all that. I just posted it just in case. I already E-Mailed KONAMI and I'm waiting for an answer. I will post it here as well.
|
|